BOE Meeting, Jan. 14, 2021

 BOE Meeting

Dr. Goldson presented the School Safety and Security Report and her recommendations, available in agenda items.

In June 2020, some BOE members proposed eliminating PGCPS School Resource Officers (SROs) in secondary schools. The discussion was tabled until September. At the 9/17 meeting, the BOE directed the CEO to bring a report and recommendations to the BOE by 1/8/2021 regarding SROs, school security, and support.

The presentation on 1/14/2021 was of her research and findings, including the community survey results and the Prince George’s County Police Reform Task Force Recommendations for PGCPS.

Dr. Goldson agreed to accept the recommendations of the Police Reform Task Force and asked for approval from the BOE to move forward in implementing the recommendations.

Valentine/Monteiro moved to accept recommendations.

Adams-Stafford stated that she had heard concerns from constituents about the survey’s design, reported bias in questions, and that it was not available in Spanish or French.

Goldson responded that the survey, as with all other surveys put out by PGCPS, was vetted by PGCPS Office of Research and Evaluation, was offered in Spanish and French, and that she does not see responses.

Ahmed stated she too had heard same concerns about survey. She stated she wants to not renew school system’s contracts with law enforcement, which is not in the recommendations. She proposed a substitute motion of continuing the conversation in the policy committee and presenting recommendations at a later date.

Thomas seconded.

Then follows a discussion with BOE lawyer, Roger Thomas, about procedure for voting on this substitute motion and number of votes needed to pass with Burroughs asking for reading of specific law.

Burroughs argues that these are important recommendations that need to be discussed and it is “disheartening” to hear a motion on this on the floor.

Chairwoman Miller agrees to table agenda item. Burroughs seconds. Motion passes unanimously. Chairwoman Miller says will appear back before body in February.

 

From consent agenda, Ahmed asked that items 6.7 (Change Order for Central HS HVAC Upgrade Project, contracted to Oak Contracting LLC, in amount of $4.5 million) and 6.8 (Contract for Lobbying Services) be presented for separate votes.

The Central HS project initially involved demolition and replacement of the steam-powered HVAC equipment with an energy-efficient system and required the relocation of the students for two years. The project was expanded to maximize having students out of the building to provide a “more comprehensive renovation” that will include a new fire alarm system, floors, painting, white boards, etc.

Ahmed explained this project has already had a $5 million change order and explanation does not give details on need for full amount. She will not vote in favor of this one.

Queen urged her colleagues to support the change order, which will result in a greatly improved school for the students.

Item passes with all but Ahmed voting yes.

 

Item 6.8 is a proposed lobbying contract with DJ Williams and Associates LLC to provide “legislative lobbying services” to the BOE at a monthly rate of $10,000 with the opportunity for the lobbyist to further submit out-of-pocket expenses to the BOE for reimbursement. The BOE will also pay for costs associated with annual legislative meetings with the county delegation. The BOE can terminate the contract at any time with/without cause with 90-days notice.

Valentine asks Burroughs series of questions:

What was selection process

                The resume provided to BOE does not show she has lobbyist experience

Will the SOW be based on the current legislative agenda and subsequent votes at board meetings

How was the compensation negotiated as it is higher than other similar contracts the BOE has negotiated in past, particularly since budget cuts will be needed for COVID

Burroughs responds that BOE had agreed that comments and questions regarding the contract were supposed to be submitted to him prior to the meeting. He clarified that the lobbyist will attend the BOE’s Policy Committee meetings and work closely with that committee. The salary will be financed by the board’s existing office budget. He then stated he wanted to call the question.

Valentine asked for a follow up as one of his questions was not answered, but Burroughs stated they were not having back-and-forth about this item. He did not choose to answer Valentine’s last question.

Vote is taken and passes.

Yes: Adams-Stafford, Ahmed, Burroughs, Harris, Murray, Queen, Thomas

No: Boozer-Strother, Monteiro, Shepherd, Valentine, Williams

Abstain: Miller, as she is just coming on board and not fully aware of this contract

 

New Business-first reader items include establishing Climate Action Plan Focus Work Group (proposed by Boozer-Strother and Jackson-student member) and Equity Learning Hubs pilot project (proposed by Adams-Stafford). Both passed to second reader.

Popular Posts