Board of Education Meeting, April 28, 2022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4EcH7ow7qI
After the meeting opening,
board prayer, and pledge of allegiance, the roll is taken. Murray and Thomas are
absent.
The April 7 work session
minutes are approved unanimously.
The news break is titled “The
Magic of Reading” and focuses on a book vending machine sponsored by Geico that
was installed at Bladensburg Elementary School and the “book fairy” teacher
whose students have enjoyed the offerings.
The board then presents its “unsung
hero” award to Delores Millhouse, a parent of two PGCPS students and staunch
advocate for the county’s language immersion programs. She is in the audience
that evening with her two children as they were also registered to speak during
public comment and is surprised by this award.
Chair Miller congratulates two
PGCPS finalists in the Washington Post teacher and principal of the year
awards. They are music teacher Thomas Pierre from Thomas Pullen and Dr. Wanda
Williams, principal of Oxon Hill Elementary School. The board has invited them
to the meeting for public acknowledgement.
Next, Chair Miller introduces
the newest appointed board member, Dr.
Zipporah Miller, who is now filling the seat vacated by Raaheelah Ahmed. Z.
Miller began her career as a science teacher in PGCPS and went on to serve in
other leadership roles in PGCPS and in other education organizations. She is now
the Director for Organizational Learning in the Anne Arundel County School
system.
Chair Miller makes
announcements regarding upcoming meetings, noting the May 25 meeting has been
cancelled due to competing priorities for the administration during graduation
season. She then turns to Adams-Stafford and Mickens-Murray to discuss the
application process for Ethics
Panel volunteers since the entire panel resigned on April 15. Adams-Stafford
explains the announcement that applications will be open is going to be advertised
this week. Applicants will be asked to submit a letter of interest and resume,
which will be due no later than Tuesday, May 10 at 5 pm.
Dr. Goldson then presents her
report, congratulating the two Washington Post finalists and the newest
Maryland Green Schools. Five of the 16 new Green Schools are in this county.
Twenty-six county schools were recertified. PGCPS has the largest number of
Green Schools in the state at 135 or 65 percent. In other good news, the
Crossland culinary arts school students
participated in the NASA challenge preparing food for space over spring break.
They landed in the top 10 teams nationwide. The event took place at Kennedy
Space Center. Crossland alumni donated money to finance the trip for the
students. Finally pre-K and K registration is open.
Mickens-Murray presents the
report of the Policy and Governance Committee. She also presents the Policy and
Governance Committee recommendations regarding development of new and revised policies.
Finally the end of session legislative update is presented. All documents are
on BoardDocs.
Chair Miller then discusses Item 2.14, which is an update on
board office restructuring. She explains that the Board discussed a
restructuring of the board office at a closed session meeting on March 10.
Since there was a question if that should have been done in the public, and out
of an abundance of caution, it was added to the agenda as a public item and for
a vote. In closed session, the proposal passed with one nay and one abstention.
The motion is to move the day-to-day operations of the board office under the administration.
Williams makes a motion and Mickens-Murray seconds. Adams-Stafford thanks board
leadership for moving this item to the public. She argues this proposal is an
anomaly in the state. She has not found another BOE whose office staff are
under the oversight of the school system. If the board’s primary responsibility
is to provide oversight this move undermines that mission. Further, she reads
from an opinion in another case that did not find good reason to move a board
to under the supervision of the school system administration.
Mickens-Murray believes that
board staff having to report to fourteen people is not sustainable. They need
just one supervisor with a clear reporting structure. The current structure
puts the employees at risk. Chair Miller recognizes Thomas, surprised that he has
requested to speak since he was not in attendance earlier. Thomas finds Miller’s
acknowledgement inappropriate but goes on to state that board leadership is
supposed to lead staff, in accordance with policy. The board has had so many
challenges because of board leadership, citing instances when he tried to call special
meetings and board leadership directed staff to not post meeting documents on
BoardDocs or deleted information from BoardDocs. There is no trust that board
leadership will act with fidelity. Although he supported this proposal in closed
session, he will vote no upon further reflection.
Mickens-Murray responds that
she can’t find policy or law that gives the board authority over staff.
Thomas responds that he was not
done with his remarks when the chair recognizes Williams and states he is trying
to maintain professionalism but he thinks it was inappropriate and disrespectful
how the chair recognized him to speak. He has parents and family who watch the
meetings. He just wants her to think about she would feel if someone spoke to
her like that on the dais. He would like an apology but it’s “not really that
deep” but it’s just frustrating you choose to acknowledge members in that
manner.
Williams explains the board was “haphazardly”
reorganized in December 2020 and as a result several at-will employees were
terminated. At this time, they only have 1/3 of the staff left in the office.
She further explains the duties of the staff and board office. In her opinion, board
staff should be protected.
Murray has also arrived at some
point and says that this idea does not make sense. He does not know of any
other board office organized like this proposal. It would be like the county
council turning over its staff to the county executive. Murray asks Nussbaum,
the board attorney, if there is anything that precludes the board from having
its own staff. Nussbaum replies they could do it either way. Murray continues
he will vote no; there is no point in having a board if there is no board
staff.
Adams-Stafford states the
solution to the constraints on current board staff would be to hire a chief of
staff. Why did board leadership not draft a hiring policy or add it to our
handbook? This is a haphazard reorganization, which is why we are having it in the
public now. She points out the current duties being advertised don’t fulfill
the duties Williams just listed.
Valentine is recognized next
and states he is not going to rehash how we got here, but his concern is potential
disruption to existing staff who have gone above and beyond during these times.
Goldson replies that as she
understands it, the board really wanted staff covered by a union. Current staff
will have to apply for jobs because none of their positions are on any union
pay scale. The administration has met with staff individually to walk them
through the process. Some staff may choose to take positions in other areas of
PGCPS and they will honor that request. The restructured positions will have
comparable pay scales.
Adams-Stafford attempts to
ask a question of legal counsel, but the chair states there are only two rounds
and she has already gone twice.
The vote is taken to move
the board office and day-to-day operations to the administration.
No: Adams-Stafford, Murray,
Thomas
Abstain: Harris
Yes: Boozer-Strother, Lasalle
Frazier, Mickens-Murray, Z. Miller, Valentine, Williams, J. Miller
Motion passes.
Public comment is next. Most are
speaking in support of the Climate Change Action Plan.
The board then passes items
4.1 through 4.5, which are proclamations for various weeks in May as well as National
Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month. Item 4.6 is taken separately with
Boozer-Strother and Ceron-Ruiz presenting the proclamation for the Observation
of Pride Month in June.
The budget consent agenda
items are next, with some discussion around the approval of Item 5.3: document control services for Capital
Programs. The vendor has been scanning blueprints, drawings, and other construction
documents for Capital Programs, which are stored on the cloud and searchable. The
supervisor of Capital Programs explains this is for a 1-year continuation of their
services: scanning, archiving, and maintaining the cloud. Adams-Stafford asks
if this will be an annual fee, which is affirmatively answered. She would like
to know if this will be turned over at some point to the school system. The supervisor
responds that the Capital Programs office does not have the staff and equipment
to do the work themselves. Chair Miller calls for the vote, and Adams-Stafford
asks if it is too late to pull an item out from the budget consent, and it is
determined that it is. As a result, Murray, Thomas, and Adams-Stafford abstain
from voting, and the other members vote yes.
The items under governance (second
reader/unfinished business) all pass. Highlights include Boozer-Strother introducing the
Climate Change Action Plan Work Group Priority Recommendations (available on
BoardDocs), the result of over a year of work with a diverse group of
stakeholders that included students, parents, PGCPS staff, climate experts, and
others. Board member Harris will be a leader in the next phase, which is
adoption of the recommendations. Boozer-Strother also acknowledges the work of
the steering committee and what a pleasure it has been to work with them. Adoption
of the plan passes unanimously.
Some discussion also occurs
around naming the new Adelphi Area MS to Adelphi MS (the new southern K-8 school
will be named for Colin Powell), with Lasalle Frazier asking that in
the future Latino leaders be considered for possible names. Goldson explains
the process that occurred, which involved a community survey and voting on a
list of names with Adelphi MS garnering the most votes. Boozer-Strother notes
there is an opportunity to recognize community members in other ways, such as
naming the media center after someone.
The new business includes a
revised draft policy 5143: bullying, harassment, or intimidation, which passes
unanimously.
Actions taken in executive
session are confirmed
The meeting adjourns.
Comments